CMT vs Package sourcing

Posted by Kathleen Fasanella on Jan 5, 2007 at 10:37 am / Glossary, Lean Manufacturing, Production, Sourcing, Textiles and Inputs / Trackback

Cleaning off my desktop I came across this question I’d never posted. Oops. I include it now because it’ll still be useful to those with similar questions or those who have not considered the implications and challenges of growth and how it can change the primary focus of their companies. I have nothing against larger concerns but I like working with smaller operations because accountability is direct, there’s less diffusion of responsibility and costs are lower. Also perhaps surprisingly, it is smaller companies that employ the most people (my primary motivation here), especially domestically.

This visitor wanted to know my opinion with regards to CMT vs. Package sourcing. For reference, CMT means hiring a contractor for the functions of Cut, Make and Trim. Package refers to contracting for sourcing the goods as well or Fabric, Cut, Make and Trim. In other words, if the cost of fabric is included in a vendors cost, they are Package.

…at the moment half of our vendors are CMT, and half are Package. We pay all our vendors commission on sourcing trims overseas that we find here in LA. The problem that we are having is that we have so many styles and so many deliveries, we can’t keep up with our fabric buys, and ensuring that fabric is in the CMT factories when it is needed. Our goal is to have all our CMT vendors buy fabric directly from our mills [established vendors]. This way we, as a company, are not liable for deliveries being late due to fabric delays. The vendor must follow up on the fabric, and if it’s late, they are responsible for ensuring garment deliveries are kept. Right now, most of our deliveries have slid because we couldn’t keep up with the mills. I feel like we push everyone to be on time, but we can’t seem to do it ourselves. One package vendor, whom I adore, tells us the truth. (I won’t say what company…although someone here knows) “John expects us to always be on time, we are penalized for not keeping deliveries, even when it is your fault. I am obligated to work with you, but you can’t expect me to be nice when my company is being held liable for your mistakes.” I love them, but why does the production team get all the anger? We just pass on what Design, Sales, and our bosses tell us to.

Yes, all Package programs will save on follow up work when it comes to fabrics, but then we won’t know why the delivery is late, and we have to trust that our vendors will keep us informed if things are falling behind. I think that we are relenquishing more & more control of production, and it’s going to back fire in the company’s face. What are your thoughts, which is better CMT or Package? Pls don’t base your opinion on my comments above, I’m just venting.


First of all, regardless of what you are outsourcing be it CMT or Package, you will still be held liable for failure to deliver to your customers. In a large operation I think issues become distorted; internally it may be useful to have someone to blame or hold accountable but it makes no difference to your buyers -who won’t be getting their goods- or to sales reps -who won’t be collecting their commissions- even assuming your contractual internal controls can temporarily offset sales losses. Regardless of size, the company won’t be in business long without product deliveries no matter how many chargebacks you can levy (and presumably collect) from erstwhile vendors who may have their own very legitimate reasons for failing to acquire the goods in a timely manner. For smaller enterprises, this situation is untenable as few are likely to have the wherewith all to enforce the payment of fines. Maybe you’ll get it eventually but you may go broke trying to collect.

The allure of package sourcing is strong, more tempting than the Siren’s song. I know that few of you can resist thinking about it because the idea of having someone else deal with the hassle of sourcing fabric is tempting but is that something you really want to do? Is it something you can do? Most smaller producers rely on the uniqueness of fabrications to sell their goods so fabric selection is rarely such that it can be sourced generically. Package is more common with commodity goods or utility items with highly engineered specifications, things that are easily detailed and quantified. Still, it is possible to package certain product lines -activewear for one- but smaller operations will still have to deal with longer turn around times when in general, a large number of them owe their competitive advantage to speed. In other words, you’ll have to inspect the goods the vendor proposes to use for your line; you can’t just trust them. That takes time and money.

Assuming you’re not in commodity goods like denim or tees, I think most everyone should source their own fabrics because you may not realize the cost savings you anticipate. There is no doubt that a package vendor producing denims, who is sourcing for several product lines and not just yours, will have greater economies of scale and can get better fabric prices than you can but the issue is, the vendor is sourcing for several product lines, not just yours so it’ll be harder to set yourself apart from competitors in your market. Another issue is testing the goods for performance; will the package vendor test the goods to comply with your specifications? You may end up spending more on attorney’s fees than it would have cost you to do the sourcing yourself. I think a better situation could be that you develop a relationship with a CMT contractor who then becomes a package vendor once they’ve (and you have) proved themselves.

Lastly, I just don’t think the savings are really there especially if you’re a small operation. It’s not Lean, you’ve added layers of complexity when you think you’ve added accountability and there’s always a price for that. Being pig-headed, all of this tends to rub me the wrong way because when it comes down to it, smaller companies are more profitable than large ones. They are you know. Dollar for dollar, calculating sales and profit per employee, smaller companies make more money than large ones.

I know quite a few of you have dealt with these issues too. I await your two cents.

5 Responses to “CMT vs Package sourcing”

Comments RSS feed

Miracle
January 5th, 2007
3:42 PM

Package is more common with commodity goods or utility items with highly engineered specifications, things that are easily detailed and quantified.

I have known of some favorable package situations, most notably the one where a company either owns, or has vertically integrated a mill and/or fabric converting operation. A colleague has considered one for higher end swimwear and some other things. But I agree with you, package is best when the company doing the packaging is entirely vertically integrated, which reduces delays in sourcing.

This is hard to accomplish with companies that produce most fashion apparel.

I understand the frustration of the person who asked the question, but it seems like they are just looking to “pass the buck” to another company. What they may really need is software to manage production better, a better integrated system, and some consulting to overhaul their production process so that they can minimize such delays.

But I will say this as a caution to DEs:

Your choices in fabrics should take into consideration the ease of sourcing and delivering fabric. Sometimes you have to let go of a fantastic fabric when delivery is unreliable.

Carol Kimball
January 7th, 2007
7:27 AM

Having reread “Lean Thinking” in the past couple days (recommended by Kathleen), it seems likely that sourcing your own fabric keeps your operation leaner. As business expands and becomes more complex, some parts need to be delegated (as Miracle notes in the above comment), but keeping track of your major components if they are from different vendors seems too critical to fob off.

Esther
January 8th, 2007
6:48 PM

Package deals are typical when outsourcing to China, or other foreign countries. Many factories are either vertically integrated or have trusted resources at their finger tips. There are the same issues of controlling fabric and trim quality (not to mention sewing quality). Still the process required to approve swatches takes a lot of time and money because of paying for expess mail. Fabric sourcing can be done in the states and drop shipped to China, done in person in Asia, or through a sourcing agent. I have good and bad experiences with sourcing in Asia. A lot depends on the companies involved and your relationship with them. Personally, if I was manufacturing in the USA, I would source everything myself. Much easier.

Dealing with delivery dates and the like can get tricky. I have seen small companies divide up the work between two or three people who coordinate with each other. Delivery dates start with sales people, get handed to a production sourcing/purchasing agent, and finally a logistics person who manages deliveries and their final due dates. Good communication is key with all parties.

Maria
March 19th, 2007
9:58 AM

Package Sourcing has destroyed the fabric, trimming the garment industry in the United States. Many goods made in China and Korea were more expensive than domestic .The US apparel manufacturers are going out of business left and right and so are the US textile mills. The quality from Asia is not the same as the goods made in America and in Europe.In less than two years there will be no more garment industry. San Francisco is a ghost town for manufacturing of clothing compared to 10 yrs ago.

[…] CMT vs Package sourcing addthis_pub = […]

Leave a Reply

Archives

Categories

The Entrepreneur's Guide to Sewn Product Manufacturing

Often described as the garment industry “blue book”, the most highly rated book in the business is guaranteed to get you off to a solid start or your money back. Many service providers require you read this before they’ll work with you. Learn more »

Subscription Options

RSS Feed Google Reader My Yahoo My MSN Technorati

Subscribe by email: