CPSIA in three acts: Shame, Honesty and Crime.

Posted by Kathleen Fasanella on Mar 31, 2009 at 3:24 pm / CPSIA / Trackback

Act One: Shame
A lot of people have already gone out of business due to CPSIA but they’re ashamed to admit it. They blame themselves because they know there was some slop in their operations and if they’d had it together, this wouldn’t have happened to them. In some ways, they were the lucky ones -if it weren’t for the self blaming and loss of self respect- because they avoided the death by paper cuts of the August tracking and labeling requirements. Maybe you could have done something to avoid it but I don’t see how. I really don’t. Failing to prevent an unforeseen event doesn’t make you any less a victim so it serves no purpose to blame yourselves. That’s why so many have gone out of business without a word or telling any but a few close friends. It’s why it’s so hard to find anyone to interview these days. If I held any sway at all, I’d ask you to put up a banner on your websites explaining that CPSIA is the reason you suspended sales. This is nothing to be ashamed of. The people who should be ashamed, the ones you’re letting off the hook, are the very people who did this to you, those who claim to help victims, the special interest groups. They don’t help victims, they are victimizers, abusers of the public trust. Slowly I think the word is getting out about them. You must hold them accountable.

Act Two: Honesty
This is what no one wants to say publicly. That in some ways (not that one would truly wish this) it would have been better if those affected by CPSIA had gone broke all at once in one fell swoop. It would have been a big story, the drama would have ensured prompt legislative action. Rampant business failures would have been more accurate outcome of what the law will end up doing anyway. But no, we got a stay on testing that had two primary effects. The first was, the stay was very effective at dissolving activism in opposition to CPSIA overnight. Those that held out were just so darn grateful for a year long testing reprieve they went back to their cubbies to carry on with what they were doing. Most are confident “somebody” is going to fix this law so by the time the stay expires in ten months, they think they will have nothing to worry about. The second effect of the stay removed a sense of urgency to consider the broader gamut of costs. Nobody is talking about the pending tracking and labeling requirements coming up in August. T&L isn’t well understood; if anything, it’s perceived as a paperwork problem that enterprises will unhappily but readily absorb. Most consider it an annoyance but not particularly burdensome. Unfortunately, T&L is insidious, that is what will kill most of the businesses left standing. The problem of tracking and labeling will pick people off, in ones and twos with no readily discernible pattern. There won’t be any dramatic news stories of death by paper cuts but that’s exactly what will happen. Assuming you don’t also go to prison that is or are levied $100,000 fines because you filled the form out improperly.

Act Three: Crime
Scene One: It is inevitable that the CPSIA law will create an endless cycle of enforcement, justification and funding. Because it’s so easy to get into the business, so easy to fail to comply, so easy to get caught and fined, the special interest groups who lobbied for this law will emphatically thump their chests and proclaim loudly “look at all these offenders”, good thing we have this law! Look at all the people we caught”. Because of the sheer complexity of labeling and tracking, violations are inevitable. Violations will have nothing to do with safety. Unfortunately, the law itself will become a self perpetuating machine of justifications for its need and continuance. The public will assume a lot of unsafe products have been prevented from entering the market when all they’ve really done is create a shopping list for any number of infractions that have nothing to do with safety at all. You can go to jail for omitting a period or putting one in the wrong place. Once they start catching “criminals”, they can get more money for enforcement meaning they’ll catch even more of you. Congress has said openly that the fines are intended to be a source of revenue. A sort of tax paid by the “guilty”.

Scene Two: CPSIA will not prevent bad actors from entering the market place. Lead and safety regulations have been on the books since the 70’s; enforcement which Congress has continually failed to fund, is the problem. Rather, the bad actors will gravitate to the poorly lit alleys of the consumer stream, preying on poor and indigent consumers who won’t have recourse to pay the higher cost of consumer goods that is inevitable under CPSIA. But there’s more, the gestation of a black market economy. If these criminals were merely doting grandmothers and home workers with no other income opportunities it wouldn’t be so bad but it will be bad. Sarah explains it best:

By increasing the height of the hurdles one has to jump to sell a legitimate product, Congress is encouraging more and more of them not to bother, and the few that are left have every reason to become less ethical. One of the reasons we have so many home crafters selling children’s products in the first place is that it’s a sort of “gray market”– a semi-regulated market– where it’s easy to start a business. Putting more pressure on a market like that will turn it into a black market in a heartbeat.

At first, little would change. But after a while, we’d start to get reports of disreputable people entering the market. Perhaps someone would import toys illegally that were hazardous, or someone might use imported fabric that was coated with a toxic chemical to make clothes. The government would find it difficult to crack down on them because they don’t have business licenses, merchant accounts, etc. Shut them down? Confiscate their merchandise? Next week they’ll be in business on a different street selling something else. Government would respond with warnings about buying that cheap black-market trash, but warnings never extend anyone’s budget enough to make them able to buy more expensive, regulated goods. Honest men and women would cut corners to compete with them. And thus would all consumer regulation on children’s products come to naught.

This play isn’t over, here’s what you can do:
Tomorrow we’re having a rally in Washington. People from all over the country have converged to protest the canceled Congressional hearings. We have been shut out of the political process. The stay is nothing but a delay with the effect of silencing you. Nothing has changed. If you do not make your voices heard, you won’t be in business much longer. Or maybe you will be but I doubt it will be legally.

  • If you’re close, attend the event in Washington DC.
  • Attend the protest live over the internet tomorrow between 10-12 AM EST via the Amend CPSIA website. Sign up in advance to get your login credentials.
  • Provide financial support. Rick Woldenberg is paying for the lobbying effort out of his personal funds. I have donated $2,000 on your behalf ($1,000 of which was donated by The Good Mama) but any assistance you can provide is sincerely appreciated. To send payment, log in to your paypal account, go to “send money” and paste in Rick’s paypal account address (rwoldenberg@learningresources.com). If you don’t have paypal or prefer other arrangements, or phone me (575-525-1577) and we can work something out. Thank you!

6 Responses to “CPSIA in three acts: Shame, Honesty and Crime.”

Comments RSS feed

Lisa DOWNTOWN JOEY
March 31st, 2009
4:15 PM

Kathleen…
This post was EXACTLY what I needed. Even though I have no idea who will be watching my kids (Mr. Diva will have to figure that one out), I WILL BE HEARD IN DC TOMORROW!

I have thought of cancelling my flight, because I feel like I’m fighting a losing battle. But then I think of what you and other CPSIA affected people have done to make our voices heard and I realize it is my obligation to be there.

I’m saddened not more children’s apparel manufacturers are attending the Rally tomorrow. We are all pinching pennies, have children and other obligations. However, if we don’t fight this, we will all be out of business next year.

I’m not going to sit here and be reactive. Instead, I chose to be proactive. I am an ambassador of Fashion-Incubator. Fashion-Incubator is the reason I was able to launch my business. Therefore, it is my responsibility to fight the poorly-written CPSIA which affects all FI children’s manufacturers.

I am thankful Kathleen and others here have given me the tools I need to fight this. I’ll report back throughtout the day if I can get internet access.

If anyone wants to meet up w/ me in DC, my cell phone number is 718-865-6752. Hope to see you there!

With friendship,
Lisa

Clara Rico
March 31st, 2009
5:17 PM

So… what does the law say about selling things labeled as containing lead? Can you believe I actually found TOYS on the shelf with a label stating that they contained lead! Wooden painted blocks and wooden puzzles. Both toys for toddlers and little kids. Surely they present a much greater danger than fabric and thread.

patsijean
April 1st, 2009
6:56 AM

I just sent $15.00. I do not have a home business, as does Dawn of Two On Two Off for example, but I do appreciate that this has become crazy. Fabric manufacturers could easily test their product and label it accordingly making it much easier on home businesses. As long as we continue to manufacure less and less in the United States, the more we will be vulnurable to imported products that are toxic. A home business cannot assorb the cost of the testing and quality control necessary at the supply source. Almost a scam, isn’t it?

Teresa
April 1st, 2009
11:32 AM

Yesterday the Textile World came out on line and reported that the CPSIA or gov was asking feed back from industry on the new regs. You might want to look on line and send comments to them. http://www.TextileWorld.com dated March 31, 2009.
Teresa

[…] Many are taking no action to save themselves from the law, but — as Kathleen Fasanella explains — act as if paralyzed by the February “stay” with its illusion of hope. […]

[…] be made sane.  A few write-ups touching on the subject: Handmade Toy Alliance (Word document), Kathleen Fasanella/Fashion Incubator, Publisher’s […]

Leave a Reply

Current ye@r *

Archives

Categories

The Entrepreneur's Guide to Sewn Product Manufacturing

Often described as the garment industry “blue book”, the most highly rated book in the business is guaranteed to get you off to a solid start or your money back. Many service providers require you read this before they’ll work with you. Learn more »

Subscription Options

RSS Feed Google Reader My Yahoo My MSN Technorati

Subscribe by email: