<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Freight and warehouse chargebacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/</link>
	<description>How to start a clothing line or run the one you have, better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:49:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4238</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 23:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2006/08/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/#comment-4238</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I wrote numerous orders for one buyer last Fall, however, the buyer is wanting to return some of the goods since certain styles did not sell. Is this common?...I was thinking since the orders were not made as some kind of consignment agreement, nor was there any kind of sell-thru guarantee made, the buyer would have to assume the risk on all of the styles that got ordered.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re too nice Andy. You need to trust your gut more. No, you should not take the goods back in the absence of any agreement. You can be nice but firm, stick to your guns.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I wrote numerous orders for one buyer last Fall, however, the buyer is wanting to return some of the goods since certain styles did not sell. Is this common?&#8230;I was thinking since the orders were not made as some kind of consignment agreement, nor was there any kind of sell-thru guarantee made, the buyer would have to assume the risk on all of the styles that got ordered.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re too nice Andy. You need to trust your gut more. No, you should not take the goods back in the absence of any agreement. You can be nice but firm, stick to your guns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4237</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 19:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2006/08/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/#comment-4237</guid>
		<description>Can anyone shed some more light on chargebacks/returns for unsold merchandise?  As a new DE, I wrote numerous orders for one buyer last Fall, however, the buyer is wanting to return some of the goods since certain styles did not sell.   Is this common?

Perhaps naively, I was thinking since the orders were not made as some kind of consignment agreement, nor was there any kind of sell-thru guarantee made, the buyer would have to assume the risk on all of the styles that got ordered.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone shed some more light on chargebacks/returns for unsold merchandise?  As a new DE, I wrote numerous orders for one buyer last Fall, however, the buyer is wanting to return some of the goods since certain styles did not sell.   Is this common?</p>
<p>Perhaps naively, I was thinking since the orders were not made as some kind of consignment agreement, nor was there any kind of sell-thru guarantee made, the buyer would have to assume the risk on all of the styles that got ordered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: another wish</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4236</link>
		<dc:creator>another wish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Aug 2006 00:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2006/08/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/#comment-4236</guid>
		<description>yes, i, too, deal with a Clothing Store that charges back for things that go on sale.

*sigh* is right.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, i, too, deal with a Clothing Store that charges back for things that go on sale.</p>
<p>*sigh* is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esther</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2006/08/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>J.C., you&#039;re right. Charging back for unsold merchandise is the same as guaranteeing sales, except without the benefit of signing an agreement beforehand. I have seen a lot of sneaky chargebacks slip through. Most retailers are upfront about charges, but there are those few that are not.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.C., you&#8217;re right. Charging back for unsold merchandise is the same as guaranteeing sales, except without the benefit of signing an agreement beforehand. I have seen a lot of sneaky chargebacks slip through. Most retailers are upfront about charges, but there are those few that are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J C Sprowls</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4234</link>
		<dc:creator>J C Sprowls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2006/08/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/#comment-4234</guid>
		<description>Esther,

You mention that some retailers will chargeback based on unsold merchandise. Isn&#039;t that the same thing as guaranteeing their order will sell-through?

Umm... whose order is it? *sigh*

Do I, as a manufacturer, get to counter offer their &quot;chargeback for unsold mdse&quot; penalty w/ a &quot;30% f/end load to manage their mistakes&quot; fee?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Esther,</p>
<p>You mention that some retailers will chargeback based on unsold merchandise. Isn&#8217;t that the same thing as guaranteeing their order will sell-through?</p>
<p>Umm&#8230; whose order is it? *sigh*</p>
<p>Do I, as a manufacturer, get to counter offer their &#8220;chargeback for unsold mdse&#8221; penalty w/ a &#8220;30% f/end load to manage their mistakes&#8221; fee?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Cunningham</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4233</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Cunningham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 03:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2006/08/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/#comment-4233</guid>
		<description>am going through this with my first shipment to major retailer right now -- you haven&#039;t even mentioned EDI yet.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am going through this with my first shipment to major retailer right now &#8212; you haven&#8217;t even mentioned EDI yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esther</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/comment-page-1/#comment-4232</link>
		<dc:creator>Esther</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2006/08/freight_and_warehouse_chargebacks/#comment-4232</guid>
		<description>When I worked with a company that sold to the Big Box guys, we had two logistics people to handle packing and shipping details - one over the packing, the second to coordinate with various carriers. It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to obtain, read, study, and implement the packing and shipping specs from the retailer. This includes quality inspections of printing labels, hang tag placement, etc. And believe me this can easily become a full time job if you deal with several big box retailers.

This list doesn&#039;t seem too bad, but it is easy to see how quickly the charges can add up. An unreasonable charge would be one that was not included on the specifications. A rule change in the middle of order fulfillment can be considered unreasonable. I have seen chargebacks for additional items like unsold merchandise and store promotions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I worked with a company that sold to the Big Box guys, we had two logistics people to handle packing and shipping details &#8211; one over the packing, the second to coordinate with various carriers. It is the responsibility of the manufacturer to obtain, read, study, and implement the packing and shipping specs from the retailer. This includes quality inspections of printing labels, hang tag placement, etc. And believe me this can easily become a full time job if you deal with several big box retailers.</p>
<p>This list doesn&#8217;t seem too bad, but it is easy to see how quickly the charges can add up. An unreasonable charge would be one that was not included on the specifications. A rule change in the middle of order fulfillment can be considered unreasonable. I have seen chargebacks for additional items like unsold merchandise and store promotions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

