<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeans fit lousy these days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/</link>
	<description>How to start a clothing line or run the one you have, better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:34:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sabine</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-21811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-21811</guid>
		<description>so, who won? I would have voted for the burda one as being the worst one, no extra room for butt cheeks in there, just good for giving you a wedgy (but I guess that is what separates the butt cheeks? ouch!), followed closely by the McCall which gives you a bit more room for well formed &quot;gludius maximus&quot; but not really any room to lift your knee high or something, better walk in short steps in those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so, who won? I would have voted for the burda one as being the worst one, no extra room for butt cheeks in there, just good for giving you a wedgy (but I guess that is what separates the butt cheeks? ouch!), followed closely by the McCall which gives you a bit more room for well formed &#8220;gludius maximus&#8221; but not really any room to lift your knee high or something, better walk in short steps in those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-19999</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-19999</guid>
		<description>A few suggestions.
I understand that everyone is looking for a good pair jeans.
Why not buy butt-lifting jeans!

Our butt-lifting jeans are built to provide no gap at the waist, to accentuate the thigh length to look longer, thinner and sexier. The backside inseam is stitched to lift, rise, gather and shape your behind so it appears rounder and smoother.  

We know from experience, you will return for another pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few suggestions.<br />
I understand that everyone is looking for a good pair jeans.<br />
Why not buy butt-lifting jeans!</p>
<p>Our butt-lifting jeans are built to provide no gap at the waist, to accentuate the thigh length to look longer, thinner and sexier. The backside inseam is stitched to lift, rise, gather and shape your behind so it appears rounder and smoother.  </p>
<p>We know from experience, you will return for another pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynne</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-19388</link>
		<dc:creator>lynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-19388</guid>
		<description>Here is my thought on the current butt shape.  They are shaped just like the dress forms.  Flat across the bum with very little slope to the waist.  I just figured they computer pattern the jeans based on a dress forms measurements, and never put them on a fit model.  Just my guess.  
Then again jeans are pretty much a 2nd skin and what are the odds of finding your perfect 2nd skin...even my sisters are shaped differently them I am and we have the same genetic code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is my thought on the current butt shape.  They are shaped just like the dress forms.  Flat across the bum with very little slope to the waist.  I just figured they computer pattern the jeans based on a dress forms measurements, and never put them on a fit model.  Just my guess.<br />
Then again jeans are pretty much a 2nd skin and what are the odds of finding your perfect 2nd skin&#8230;even my sisters are shaped differently them I am and we have the same genetic code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shelly</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-19363</link>
		<dc:creator>shelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-19363</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is really fun reading everyone&#039;s comments! I agree with Sahara that the mono butt  may have come from Daryl K. That look doesn&#039;t really bother me if that&#039;s what you want - a lift in the back due to low and tight back pockets and squeezed cheeks. I have patterned jeans for a client, Little in the Middle, and her (patented) fit is 1 or 2 sizes smaller in the waist and they feel great on me and have seen them on many others that swear by them. Because of this blog I have so many other labels that I want to try, thanks Kathleen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is really fun reading everyone&#8217;s comments! I agree with Sahara that the mono butt  may have come from Daryl K. That look doesn&#8217;t really bother me if that&#8217;s what you want &#8211; a lift in the back due to low and tight back pockets and squeezed cheeks. I have patterned jeans for a client, Little in the Middle, and her (patented) fit is 1 or 2 sizes smaller in the waist and they feel great on me and have seen them on many others that swear by them. Because of this blog I have so many other labels that I want to try, thanks Kathleen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-19355</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-19355</guid>
		<description>I have to say that split butt jeans are really unattractive to me, and probably to the rest of my generation and the younger ones (I&#039;m 29). We have a tendency to avoid anything that shows the shape of &quot;private parts&quot;. We don&#039;t like pants that show the shape of the crotch on guys or girls, we don&#039;t like seeing the split in the butt (and therefore that crotch again) and we don&#039;t mind cleavage but we don&#039;t like showing the shape of the entire breast all the way to the bottom (ie you won&#039;t catch us in empire waist dresses without bras letting the girls hang down over the high empire waist).

Speaking culturally maybe it&#039;s because in our lifetime sexual images have been really out there and rather accepted. Showing the shape and curve of a body using the outside silhouette, such as a continual curve over the butt (mono butt) is seen as sexy to us whereas splitting an a$$ down the middle and being very obvious about where the person&#039;s crotch is (as seen from behind) is actually a bit vulgar because in our lifetimes we&#039;ve seen that as a $exual image (classic image of a girl wearing a string bikini, standing with her back to the camera, butt cheeks clearly showing that string bikini disappearing somewhere comes to mind) and so to having it like that during every day non-$exual moments is...yah, vulgar. Not that I care that much but I can&#039;t think of a better word, it&#039;s different than unattractive. It is a bit attractive but in a dirty $exual sense, not a sensual $exy and pretty sense...let&#039;s say 6/10 on the vulgar scale.

p.s. sorry about the $$&#039;s but the spam thing didn&#039;t like all the $exy words</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say that split butt jeans are really unattractive to me, and probably to the rest of my generation and the younger ones (I&#8217;m 29). We have a tendency to avoid anything that shows the shape of &#8220;private parts&#8221;. We don&#8217;t like pants that show the shape of the crotch on guys or girls, we don&#8217;t like seeing the split in the butt (and therefore that crotch again) and we don&#8217;t mind cleavage but we don&#8217;t like showing the shape of the entire breast all the way to the bottom (ie you won&#8217;t catch us in empire waist dresses without bras letting the girls hang down over the high empire waist).</p>
<p>Speaking culturally maybe it&#8217;s because in our lifetime sexual images have been really out there and rather accepted. Showing the shape and curve of a body using the outside silhouette, such as a continual curve over the butt (mono butt) is seen as sexy to us whereas splitting an a$$ down the middle and being very obvious about where the person&#8217;s crotch is (as seen from behind) is actually a bit vulgar because in our lifetimes we&#8217;ve seen that as a $exual image (classic image of a girl wearing a string bikini, standing with her back to the camera, butt cheeks clearly showing that string bikini disappearing somewhere comes to mind) and so to having it like that during every day non-$exual moments is&#8230;yah, vulgar. Not that I care that much but I can&#8217;t think of a better word, it&#8217;s different than unattractive. It is a bit attractive but in a dirty $exual sense, not a sensual $exy and pretty sense&#8230;let&#8217;s say 6/10 on the vulgar scale.</p>
<p>p.s. sorry about the $$&#8217;s but the spam thing didn&#8217;t like all the $exy words</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: km</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator>km</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-12290</guid>
		<description>I finally got to try a pair of Rockies over the Christmas vacation. Wow. They fit wonderfully. I have only made my own jeans for the last three years. I don&#039;t remember the last time I bought a pair that fit this nicely.

The fabric is 13 oz denim and feels wonderful in your hand. None of that whimpy denim they have been passing off as jeans fabric. And the cut is so comfortable. They are made to sit and to move. Yes they have thigh room. The store only had one pair in my size, but I plan to buy more. 

Thank you Kathleen, finding these jeans was a wonderful Christmas present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally got to try a pair of Rockies over the Christmas vacation. Wow. They fit wonderfully. I have only made my own jeans for the last three years. I don&#8217;t remember the last time I bought a pair that fit this nicely.</p>
<p>The fabric is 13 oz denim and feels wonderful in your hand. None of that whimpy denim they have been passing off as jeans fabric. And the cut is so comfortable. They are made to sit and to move. Yes they have thigh room. The store only had one pair in my size, but I plan to buy more. </p>
<p>Thank you Kathleen, finding these jeans was a wonderful Christmas present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-11742</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-11742</guid>
		<description>I am a runner and the most frustrating thing for me is to find jeans that fit.  For runners, our thighs get large due to muscles, but the remaining portions usually remain small.  So, finding jeans that not only fit in the thighs, but also in the hips/but is merely impossible.  Another thing is that I hate jeans with a low crotch.  My waist is around my hip bone and that is where I usually wear my jeans.  Unfortunately, the jeans that are mature looking all have relaxed fitting crotches and they hang down well past where they should!  Frustrating!  Does anyone have any suggestion or a brand they would recommend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a runner and the most frustrating thing for me is to find jeans that fit.  For runners, our thighs get large due to muscles, but the remaining portions usually remain small.  So, finding jeans that not only fit in the thighs, but also in the hips/but is merely impossible.  Another thing is that I hate jeans with a low crotch.  My waist is around my hip bone and that is where I usually wear my jeans.  Unfortunately, the jeans that are mature looking all have relaxed fitting crotches and they hang down well past where they should!  Frustrating!  Does anyone have any suggestion or a brand they would recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>Oh yes!  
I would love to show our jeans!  We heard that complaint so many times we now market our jeans for this market.  No more buying jeans size 14 when your waist size is 10 because you need to make up for a lack of thigh and butt room.  I wish I could send a shot of our jeans to prove my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yes!<br />
I would love to show our jeans!  We heard that complaint so many times we now market our jeans for this market.  No more buying jeans size 14 when your waist size is 10 because you need to make up for a lack of thigh and butt room.  I wish I could send a shot of our jeans to prove my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christy t</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-10157</link>
		<dc:creator>christy t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-10157</guid>
		<description>Yay hooray!!!
Thanks for running the contest - I don&#039;t have to post a butt shot in the TT Jeans, do I?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay hooray!!!<br />
Thanks for running the contest &#8211; I don&#8217;t have to post a butt shot in the TT Jeans, do I?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celeste Houlihan</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/comment-page-2/#comment-10156</link>
		<dc:creator>Celeste Houlihan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2008/04/jeans_fit_lousy_these_days/#comment-10156</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s the McCalls hands-down!  They must be drafting for aliens or something!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s the McCalls hands-down!  They must be drafting for aliens or something!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
