<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My response to Representative Schakowsky</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/</link>
	<description>How to start a clothing line or run the one you have, better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:49:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen Fasanella</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-2/#comment-48574</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-48574</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My complaint with your post is that you chose to turn this over regulation into a “liberal” activity. It isn’t...We do not need to be divided. And our conversation should not resort to labeling anything as liberal or conservative.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;
Frankly, I&#039;m at a loss for words. It just goes to show that people will selectively read and interpret what they will no matter how carefully one crafts their words. Minimally, it is humorous as I&#039;ve been the one person in this entire debate that has railed against right-left divisiveness. I&#039;ll quote a comment my husband wrote above (reading comments is helpful!) and leave it at that. He wrote:
&lt;blockquote&gt;I think the Congresswoman missed her target by a country mile... I think this letter may have been the first round of attempts to marginalize Kathleen as a reactionary;  shortly after receiving this, I picked up a search on my blog for  “Kathleen Fasanella campaign contributions” from someone in Washington  D.C. Yep, my wife, the Subaru wagon drivin’, Co-op America joinin’,  vegetarian, Democratic headquarter election night partyin’, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/npr_pledge_week/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NPR listenin’&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/silence_lends_consent/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;immigrant defendin’&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/taos_solar_music_festival/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;solar music festival attendin’&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/is_fast_fashion_sustainable/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sustainability advocatin’&lt;/a&gt; (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/theres_more_to_green_than_money/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;again&lt;/a&gt;) neocon.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My complaint with your post is that you chose to turn this over regulation into a “liberal” activity. It isn’t&#8230;We do not need to be divided. And our conversation should not resort to labeling anything as liberal or conservative.  </p></blockquote>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m at a loss for words. It just goes to show that people will selectively read and interpret what they will no matter how carefully one crafts their words. Minimally, it is humorous as I&#8217;ve been the one person in this entire debate that has railed against right-left divisiveness. I&#8217;ll quote a comment my husband wrote above (reading comments is helpful!) and leave it at that. He wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>I think the Congresswoman missed her target by a country mile&#8230; I think this letter may have been the first round of attempts to marginalize Kathleen as a reactionary;  shortly after receiving this, I picked up a search on my blog for  “Kathleen Fasanella campaign contributions” from someone in Washington  D.C. Yep, my wife, the Subaru wagon drivin’, Co-op America joinin’,  vegetarian, Democratic headquarter election night partyin’, <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/npr_pledge_week/" rel="nofollow">NPR listenin’</a>, <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/silence_lends_consent/" rel="nofollow">immigrant defendin’</a>, <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/taos_solar_music_festival/" rel="nofollow">solar music festival attendin’</a>, <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/is_fast_fashion_sustainable/" rel="nofollow">sustainability advocatin’</a> (and <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/theres_more_to_green_than_money/" rel="nofollow">again</a>) neocon.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-2/#comment-48478</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 15:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-48478</guid>
		<description>I found this post when looking for a stuffed bunny pattern and was interested in your experience.

I agree with the fact that legislation that allegedly is for the good of the country hurts its citizens and serves no purpose. In my own state, our zealous tax department decided to clamp down on hobby vendors at craft shows to make sure they had business licenses. To make it worse, if you do not report any sales tax collection for 6 months, they rescind your license, and you have to pay for a new one. 

This has eliminated all of the wonderful crafters that occasionally do one or two craft shows during the holidays. The retired woodworkers that make a few toy cars, and the grandmothers that sell the hand knitted potholders, stuffed animals and doll clothes.

My complaint with your post is that you chose to turn this over regulation into a &quot;liberal&quot; activity. It isn&#039;t. People all along the political spectrum are capable of stupidity and ignorance. I am liberal and I am fighting against the legislation that makes it a crime for Americans to craft and sell their wares. In my state, it was conservative politicians that created tax laws that drove small crafters out of business.

We do not need to be divided. And our conversation should not resort to labeling anything as liberal or conservative. It does no good to foster divisiveness by using  such labels for something we disagree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this post when looking for a stuffed bunny pattern and was interested in your experience.</p>
<p>I agree with the fact that legislation that allegedly is for the good of the country hurts its citizens and serves no purpose. In my own state, our zealous tax department decided to clamp down on hobby vendors at craft shows to make sure they had business licenses. To make it worse, if you do not report any sales tax collection for 6 months, they rescind your license, and you have to pay for a new one. </p>
<p>This has eliminated all of the wonderful crafters that occasionally do one or two craft shows during the holidays. The retired woodworkers that make a few toy cars, and the grandmothers that sell the hand knitted potholders, stuffed animals and doll clothes.</p>
<p>My complaint with your post is that you chose to turn this over regulation into a &#8220;liberal&#8221; activity. It isn&#8217;t. People all along the political spectrum are capable of stupidity and ignorance. I am liberal and I am fighting against the legislation that makes it a crime for Americans to craft and sell their wares. In my state, it was conservative politicians that created tax laws that drove small crafters out of business.</p>
<p>We do not need to be divided. And our conversation should not resort to labeling anything as liberal or conservative. It does no good to foster divisiveness by using  such labels for something we disagree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPSIA: Russian nesting dolls, paper clips, science kits</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-2/#comment-26493</link>
		<dc:creator>CPSIA: Russian nesting dolls, paper clips, science kits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-26493</guid>
		<description>[...] not meant for the under-12 set, at least not since the enactment of the calamitous Jan-Schakowsky-backed law:  the law requires each batch of toys be tested by a 3rd party laboratory to be sure they are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] not meant for the under-12 set, at least not since the enactment of the calamitous Jan-Schakowsky-backed law:  the law requires each batch of toys be tested by a 3rd party laboratory to be sure they are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kaji</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-2/#comment-13525</link>
		<dc:creator>kaji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-13525</guid>
		<description>I think Rep Schakowsky has a long history of idiotic legislation.  Here is part of an email that I originally sent to her in 2007:  
= = = = = = = =
Subject: Pending H.R. activity
Hon. Rep. Schakowsky;
    We were reading H.R.1216 info on your web page and are concerned about this section:  
• Requires the government to study making power windows (in automobiles) automatically reverse direction when they detect an obstruction to prevent children from being trapped, injured or killed and to report back to Congress if they don’t conclude that such a mandate is necessary; 

    We think that preventing the window from closing or allowing reversing is more dangerous to those who are attempting to escape from abusers, robberies, and carjackers than the number of children who would be harmed by an automatic closure.  Children should be strapped into their carseat, thus preventing them from reaching the TOP of the window, which is the only spot where they might get hurt.  .....

= = = = = = = = = = = = =
This bill was passed anyway in Jan. 2008 and went to the D.O.T. for &#039;study&#039;.  I contacted the Dept. Of Trans. and asked them to include statistics re abusers, robberies, and carjackers in their study. Of course, it is all just a waste of taxpayer money - Congress&#039; main skill, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Rep Schakowsky has a long history of idiotic legislation.  Here is part of an email that I originally sent to her in 2007:<br />
= = = = = = = =<br />
Subject: Pending H.R. activity<br />
Hon. Rep. Schakowsky;<br />
    We were reading H.R.1216 info on your web page and are concerned about this section:<br />
• Requires the government to study making power windows (in automobiles) automatically reverse direction when they detect an obstruction to prevent children from being trapped, injured or killed and to report back to Congress if they don’t conclude that such a mandate is necessary; </p>
<p>    We think that preventing the window from closing or allowing reversing is more dangerous to those who are attempting to escape from abusers, robberies, and carjackers than the number of children who would be harmed by an automatic closure.  Children should be strapped into their carseat, thus preventing them from reaching the TOP of the window, which is the only spot where they might get hurt.  &#8230;..</p>
<p>= = = = = = = = = = = = =<br />
This bill was passed anyway in Jan. 2008 and went to the D.O.T. for &#8217;study&#8217;.  I contacted the Dept. Of Trans. and asked them to include statistics re abusers, robberies, and carjackers in their study. Of course, it is all just a waste of taxpayer money &#8211; Congress&#8217; main skill, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-2/#comment-13218</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-13218</guid>
		<description>Brilliant.  Absolutely brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant.  Absolutely brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathe</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-1/#comment-13051</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-13051</guid>
		<description>Very well-written. Thank you for your willingness to address these attacks. It&#039;s been hurtful for all of us to be portrayed as &quot;moneygrubbing baby-haters&quot; (yes, that was posted in response to a blog article I published) when most of have very strong feelings about the safety and welfare of our children.  I am glad we have such an advocate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well-written. Thank you for your willingness to address these attacks. It&#8217;s been hurtful for all of us to be portrayed as &#8220;moneygrubbing baby-haters&#8221; (yes, that was posted in response to a blog article I published) when most of have very strong feelings about the safety and welfare of our children.  I am glad we have such an advocate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Ho</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-1/#comment-12995</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Ho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-12995</guid>
		<description>...and what would you expect from a congresswoman that proudly shows a list of earmarks on her website! They are actually called &quot;earmarks&quot; http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/ top right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and what would you expect from a congresswoman that proudly shows a list of earmarks on her website! They are actually called &#8220;earmarks&#8221; <a href="http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/" rel="nofollow">http://www.house.gov/schakowsky/</a> top right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david foster</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-1/#comment-12976</link>
		<dc:creator>david foster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-12976</guid>
		<description>A genuinely nasty letter from the Congressperson. And her line&quot; I agree that the Consumer Product Safety Commission, under the leadership of Chair Nancy Nord, has not implemented the law in such a way that provided guidance and answers to business owners in a timely fashon&quot; is a cop-out, and one I have heard before from both sides of the aisle. Congress is filled with lawyers--they should be able to write legislation that provides reasonably clear guidance to the agencies that must administer them. Ms Schakowsky--If you and your fellow Congressmen can&#039;t clarify your thoughts well enough to write coherent and unambiguous legislation, don&#039;t blame some administrator for your own inabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A genuinely nasty letter from the Congressperson. And her line&#8221; I agree that the Consumer Product Safety Commission, under the leadership of Chair Nancy Nord, has not implemented the law in such a way that provided guidance and answers to business owners in a timely fashon&#8221; is a cop-out, and one I have heard before from both sides of the aisle. Congress is filled with lawyers&#8211;they should be able to write legislation that provides reasonably clear guidance to the agencies that must administer them. Ms Schakowsky&#8211;If you and your fellow Congressmen can&#8217;t clarify your thoughts well enough to write coherent and unambiguous legislation, don&#8217;t blame some administrator for your own inabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Saunders</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-1/#comment-12972</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Saunders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-12972</guid>
		<description>Another thought...I reread this letter and it made me so mad. I really think you need to send a copy of this letter as well as a description of why this law is so bad to every news station there is. I have been pushing for press on the local level and got some...sent to Bill O&#039;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh as well and they talked about it but most are focusing on toys and not apparel. We really need to push this issue some how. I have sent detailed letter after detailed letter to our Senators...they respond with we are saving the children and quote the law. There is no interest in doing what is right or using common sense or addressing the issues that make this law unconstitutional and unjust as well as unenforceable. I think it is time to go to the media.  With this and the taxes Obama is about to place on small businesses for healthcare, energy and whatever else he can, small businesses are done as we no it and so is the America that allowed them to thrive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thought&#8230;I reread this letter and it made me so mad. I really think you need to send a copy of this letter as well as a description of why this law is so bad to every news station there is. I have been pushing for press on the local level and got some&#8230;sent to Bill O&#8217;Reilly and Rush Limbaugh as well and they talked about it but most are focusing on toys and not apparel. We really need to push this issue some how. I have sent detailed letter after detailed letter to our Senators&#8230;they respond with we are saving the children and quote the law. There is no interest in doing what is right or using common sense or addressing the issues that make this law unconstitutional and unjust as well as unenforceable. I think it is time to go to the media.  With this and the taxes Obama is about to place on small businesses for healthcare, energy and whatever else he can, small businesses are done as we no it and so is the America that allowed them to thrive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz Gumbinner</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/my-response-to-representative-schakowsky/comment-page-1/#comment-12969</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz Gumbinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 13:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=3105#comment-12969</guid>
		<description>Absolutely fantastic response. Professional, thorough, and factual.

It&#039;s breaking my heart that representatives I otherwise admire and respect are so misinformed about the law and guided by a belief that this is bad business versus good mommies. This is why we also need more democratic politicians advocating cpsia changes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely fantastic response. Professional, thorough, and factual.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s breaking my heart that representatives I otherwise admire and respect are so misinformed about the law and guided by a belief that this is bad business versus good mommies. This is why we also need more democratic politicians advocating cpsia changes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

