<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Problems in problem prevention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/problems_in_problem_prevention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/problems_in_problem_prevention/</link>
	<description>How to start a clothing line or run the one you have, better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 22:49:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nosaj</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/problems_in_problem_prevention/comment-page-1/#comment-11383</link>
		<dc:creator>nosaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 05:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2005/10/problems_in_problem_prevention/#comment-11383</guid>
		<description>@karen - toyota has the incentive to help breed its suppliers because its product lifetime is a lot longer and they depend less on marketing than actual build of product.  in the apparel industry, seasons come and go, new lines are created 3-7 times depending on the market. also, toyota&#039;s subcontractors manufacture parts that are proprietary, complex and r&amp;d intensive.  such is not true for the majority of the apparel industry.  i can say that nike, despite all its labor woes, does invest in its subcontractors, however this is partly due to potential losses from piracy that can occur if nike does not provide better incentives to the subcontractors.  lastly, the difference in potential damage.  i believe you remember the ford/firestone fiasco complete with exploding tires.  what happens if the stitching on my northface jacket is off by 1/4 inch?  and what&#039;s the cost for them to repair the situation?  

so what i&#039;m saying is that unless the brand is focused on producing the BEST QUALITY clothes, as toyota is focused on the BEST QUALITY cars, then the toyota way would not apply.  lastly, from porter&#039;s 5 forces, the cost of changing suppliers is extremely low in the apparel industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@karen &#8211; toyota has the incentive to help breed its suppliers because its product lifetime is a lot longer and they depend less on marketing than actual build of product.  in the apparel industry, seasons come and go, new lines are created 3-7 times depending on the market. also, toyota&#8217;s subcontractors manufacture parts that are proprietary, complex and r&amp;d intensive.  such is not true for the majority of the apparel industry.  i can say that nike, despite all its labor woes, does invest in its subcontractors, however this is partly due to potential losses from piracy that can occur if nike does not provide better incentives to the subcontractors.  lastly, the difference in potential damage.  i believe you remember the ford/firestone fiasco complete with exploding tires.  what happens if the stitching on my northface jacket is off by 1/4 inch?  and what&#8217;s the cost for them to repair the situation?  </p>
<p>so what i&#8217;m saying is that unless the brand is focused on producing the BEST QUALITY clothes, as toyota is focused on the BEST QUALITY cars, then the toyota way would not apply.  lastly, from porter&#8217;s 5 forces, the cost of changing suppliers is extremely low in the apparel industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocio</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/problems_in_problem_prevention/comment-page-1/#comment-11376</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 17:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2005/10/problems_in_problem_prevention/#comment-11376</guid>
		<description>Kathleen,

Great article!... I have suspected for a long time that the part human nature plays in manufacturing is not so obvious to most people, and finally this article brings it to light. 

The last couple of weeks I&#039;ve seen first hand the effect that the economy has had on factories that didn&#039;t adapt with the times....
The building we&#039;re in had 4 companies (1 closed down 2 weeks ago, 1 decided to sneak out over the weekend, and my neighbour is planning on closing next week) and now it seems like we are the only ones left standing.... The main difference is that our company culture is completely result driven.
The hardest part of bringing employees into a culture that is so different from their previous employers is that it takes a while for them to trust that things won&#039;t change as we grow...
Once they overcome their fears, the results speak for themselves.

Saying that, it has been a very steep learning curve (as in human behaviour, and psychological learning) and I know that there will always be room for improvement</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kathleen,</p>
<p>Great article!&#8230; I have suspected for a long time that the part human nature plays in manufacturing is not so obvious to most people, and finally this article brings it to light. </p>
<p>The last couple of weeks I&#8217;ve seen first hand the effect that the economy has had on factories that didn&#8217;t adapt with the times&#8230;.<br />
The building we&#8217;re in had 4 companies (1 closed down 2 weeks ago, 1 decided to sneak out over the weekend, and my neighbour is planning on closing next week) and now it seems like we are the only ones left standing&#8230;. The main difference is that our company culture is completely result driven.<br />
The hardest part of bringing employees into a culture that is so different from their previous employers is that it takes a while for them to trust that things won&#8217;t change as we grow&#8230;<br />
Once they overcome their fears, the results speak for themselves.</p>
<p>Saying that, it has been a very steep learning curve (as in human behaviour, and psychological learning) and I know that there will always be room for improvement</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fashion-Incubator</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/problems_in_problem_prevention/comment-page-1/#comment-888</link>
		<dc:creator>Fashion-Incubator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 20:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2005/10/problems_in_problem_prevention/#comment-888</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Toronto Fashion Incubator&lt;/strong&gt;

I like the Toronto Fashion Incubator even though they ignore me. You&#039;d think I&#039;d rate a link but no such luck. Still, if I only wrote about people that gave me the time of day, you&#039;d have very little to...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Toronto Fashion Incubator</strong></p>
<p>I like the Toronto Fashion Incubator even though they ignore me. You&#8217;d think I&#8217;d rate a link but no such luck. Still, if I only wrote about people that gave me the time of day, you&#8217;d have very little to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Wilhelm</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/problems_in_problem_prevention/comment-page-1/#comment-887</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Wilhelm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/2005/10/problems_in_problem_prevention/#comment-887</guid>
		<description>Good that people are reading the Machine that Changed the World. It had a profound impact. But to keep learning, keep reading. &quot;Lean Thinking&quot; by Womack and Jones, authors of &quot;Machine,&quot; is very worthwhile. I just read &quot;The Toyota Way&quot; by Jeff Liker. Even if you have to generalize to get past the one automotive company focus, you will learn immensely.

As for your subcontractor-- they are your supplier. Toyota has had a strategy of supplier development for decades. They say, &quot;If you want us to buy from you, you have to improve, and we will help you.&quot; If the supplier doesn&#039;t, they lose the business. Few companies have Toyota&#039;s leverage, unfortunately. Anyway, the reason your subcontractor&#039;s sewers don&#039;t pay attention to quality revolves around practices that Kathleen mentions, but another way of looking at it is that the company&#039;s culture and management are way off what you want. If you could identify a subcontractor practicing lean, in its correct sense, you could give them your business. And that success should motivate them to keep getting better and better, not to mention treating you -- their customer -- as the most important person in the world. But more importantly, you could start rating such companies and publishing your ratings, thus promising the learning company more business -- which they will want if they are lean because they will have the productivity and capacity to take it on. The bad companies, in theory, will become dinosaurs and die off -- or learn.

Do you know of any outstanding companies in the apparel industry?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good that people are reading the Machine that Changed the World. It had a profound impact. But to keep learning, keep reading. &#8220;Lean Thinking&#8221; by Womack and Jones, authors of &#8220;Machine,&#8221; is very worthwhile. I just read &#8220;The Toyota Way&#8221; by Jeff Liker. Even if you have to generalize to get past the one automotive company focus, you will learn immensely.</p>
<p>As for your subcontractor&#8211; they are your supplier. Toyota has had a strategy of supplier development for decades. They say, &#8220;If you want us to buy from you, you have to improve, and we will help you.&#8221; If the supplier doesn&#8217;t, they lose the business. Few companies have Toyota&#8217;s leverage, unfortunately. Anyway, the reason your subcontractor&#8217;s sewers don&#8217;t pay attention to quality revolves around practices that Kathleen mentions, but another way of looking at it is that the company&#8217;s culture and management are way off what you want. If you could identify a subcontractor practicing lean, in its correct sense, you could give them your business. And that success should motivate them to keep getting better and better, not to mention treating you &#8212; their customer &#8212; as the most important person in the world. But more importantly, you could start rating such companies and publishing your ratings, thus promising the learning company more business &#8212; which they will want if they are lean because they will have the productivity and capacity to take it on. The bad companies, in theory, will become dinosaurs and die off &#8212; or learn.</p>
<p>Do you know of any outstanding companies in the apparel industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

