Comments on: Reporters looking to interview designers

By: Kathleen

Kathleen — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:15:59 +0000

Reporter from the Wall Street Journal wants to interview manufacturers who went out of business due to cpsia.

Email me directly and include the following information or I won’t pass it along.
name
business name
phone/cell
city/state
url if you have one

In addition, please write a paragraph or so (be succinct) with your story of how this law has put you out of business.

The reporter already has the cost of testing angle covered so you don’t need to do anything other than mention it but not flog it. He’s interested in the reasons for driving you out of business. Imo, it seems he is particularly interested in the issue of inventory and whether your stores have returned product to you and if so, what is the value or cost of it to you. He’s also looking for a personal touch here, something readers can connect with.

Repeating, I will not forward your response if you don’t include the above information.

By: Melissa

Melissa — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:54:43 +0000

I’ve been contacted by a reporter for a major NJ newspaper who would like to write an article about this. He’s looking for New Jersey business owners who will be affected by the impending CPSIA regulations. If you are willing to be interviewed, please contact me through the contact form on my website, and I’ll tell you how to get in touch with the reporter.

http://www.moosemangames.com

By: Valerie Burner

Valerie Burner — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:39:32 +0000

Please sign the ipetition here: http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/RepealCPSIA/signatures-5.html

By: Laura

Laura — Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:34:27 +0000

Thanks Alison, I’m lurking there too. Well, a couple posts:)
I’m LauraL and see you there as well. peace

By: kristen hallagan

kristen hallagan — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:53:11 +0000

Kathleen –

happy to help if you need anyone in my area – western NY – here is a link to an interview I gave this week to our local station

http://www.13wham.com/mediacenter/local.aspx?videoid=203654@video.wokr13.com&navCatId=5

By: Alison Cummins

Alison Cummins — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:03:18 +0000

Laura, While the blog is free, there is also a forum that you need to buy the book to get access to. If you like the blog, you'll love the forum.

By: bente

bente — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:05:00 +0000

Thank you some much for your endless effort in getting this rules changed.
And thanks to Laura of reminding me of the donation button.

Here is something I pasted out from CPSC web site:

This is taken from a “notice of proposed rulemaking” signed by Todd A. Stevenson, secretary of CPSC, dated January 9. page 7 and 8.

D. Impact on Small Businesses
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), when an agency issues a proposed rule, it generally must prepare an initial regulatory flexibility analysis describing the impact the proposed rule is expected to have on small entities. 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA does not require a regulatory flexibility analysis if the head of the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant effect on a substantial number of small entities.
The Commission’s Directorate for Economic Analysis prepared a preliminary assessment of the impact of relieving certain material or products from the testing requirements of section 102 of the CPSIA if they were found to be inherently under the lead content limits prescribed. The number of small businesses that will be directly affected by the rule is unknown but could be considerable. However, it will not result in any increase in the costs of production for any firm. Its only effect on businesses, including small businesses, will be to reduce the costs that would have been associated with testing the materials under section 102 of the CPSIA. Based on the foregoing assessment, the Commission preliminarily finds that the proposed rule would not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Perhaps you also are wondering where RFA gets their information.

and post your comments there…

By: Laura

Laura — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:39:13 +0000

Thank you so much Kathleen. This could so easily have been a paid membership, as discussed, and many of us would be more than willing. Your tireless efforts on keeping us up to date on the CPSIA should be recognized! Really, all of the content is great.

I for one am going over to that donation button after I hit submit and suggest you all do the same!(How do I make that bold?) Whatever. Any amount is better than nothing. Let’s show some love.

From a long time lurker, not that big on posting or commenting, thank you a thousand times!