<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why handmade is best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/</link>
	<description>How to start a clothing line or run the one you have, better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:30:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth Meyerink-Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-31745</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Meyerink-Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-31745</guid>
		<description>This explains a lot, really. I&#039;ve thought for a long time that I could save *huge* amounts of time if I had another five or six machines (buttonholer, bartacker, 6 thread serger, and 2-3 more single-needle lockstitch machines) so I didn&#039;t have to keep switching out feet, feed dogs, swapping thread, putting on/taking off a binder...  For now I have to batch (when I make more than one of something) because it costs me more time to change my machine over to another operation, but I hope to someday have the space and machines to not need to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This explains a lot, really. I&#8217;ve thought for a long time that I could save *huge* amounts of time if I had another five or six machines (buttonholer, bartacker, 6 thread serger, and 2-3 more single-needle lockstitch machines) so I didn&#8217;t have to keep switching out feet, feed dogs, swapping thread, putting on/taking off a binder&#8230;  For now I have to batch (when I make more than one of something) because it costs me more time to change my machine over to another operation, but I hope to someday have the space and machines to not need to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fashion Incubator » Worn-out fashion terms</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-31692</link>
		<dc:creator>Fashion Incubator » Worn-out fashion terms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 00:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-31692</guid>
		<description>[...] I do think the D.I.Y. shoes in the illustration are hysterical, akin to these train wrecks (context), you see such things everywhere. I think it’s symptomatic of the IKEA Effect and certainly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I do think the D.I.Y. shoes in the illustration are hysterical, akin to these train wrecks (context), you see such things everywhere. I think it’s symptomatic of the IKEA Effect and certainly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClaireOKC</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-15096</link>
		<dc:creator>ClaireOKC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-15096</guid>
		<description>I just love your blog and love reading it....I didn&#039;t believe one-piece flow is faster than batching either, till I saw your video - what an eye-opener...how neat to tell my clients that not only are they getting a better product, but one that&#039;s done quicker!  I compete directly with a local retailer(the local bridal shop) and have always felt that I could turn my styles/fashion on a dime and that they were better quality, but never thought about it being quicker.  Currently have client who is waiting for her RTW to be altered, while we&#039;re moving along and will probably be done before her RTW is altered and done. 

I also agree with your commenters point that there is some handmade that is very shoddy.  I&#039;ve done repair work in the past after &quot;mistakes&quot;, but have started a new policy that I don&#039;t take this on anymore, as the mistakes can go very deep (wrong cuts) and corrections that cause more problems than they cure.

Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just love your blog and love reading it&#8230;.I didn&#8217;t believe one-piece flow is faster than batching either, till I saw your video &#8211; what an eye-opener&#8230;how neat to tell my clients that not only are they getting a better product, but one that&#8217;s done quicker!  I compete directly with a local retailer(the local bridal shop) and have always felt that I could turn my styles/fashion on a dime and that they were better quality, but never thought about it being quicker.  Currently have client who is waiting for her RTW to be altered, while we&#8217;re moving along and will probably be done before her RTW is altered and done. </p>
<p>I also agree with your commenters point that there is some handmade that is very shoddy.  I&#8217;ve done repair work in the past after &#8220;mistakes&#8221;, but have started a new policy that I don&#8217;t take this on anymore, as the mistakes can go very deep (wrong cuts) and corrections that cause more problems than they cure.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liron</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-15046</link>
		<dc:creator>Liron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-15046</guid>
		<description>The nature of my work IS handmade, and whenever I make a few of the same item I always make them separately. It helps me to be more organized. Working with different piles of cut garments is confusing and I only did it once before realizing I wasn&#039;t saving any time doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nature of my work IS handmade, and whenever I make a few of the same item I always make them separately. It helps me to be more organized. Working with different piles of cut garments is confusing and I only did it once before realizing I wasn&#8217;t saving any time doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike C</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-15018</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-15018</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If the stitchers can work from a variety of positins it will be much healthier on their backs, which I expect would boost matabolism and reduce injury leave.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;ve never heard this before.  

Intuitively, as the body evolved for walking, I would expect that walking would be healthier than sitting in a chair.  If there&#039;s non-anecdotal evidence to the contrary, I&#039;d love to see it.

I do know that in the TSS pods I&#039;ve seen, inserting sitting anywhere on the line would be a nightmare and would almost certainly increase the odds of injury rather than reduce it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If the stitchers can work from a variety of positins it will be much healthier on their backs, which I expect would boost matabolism and reduce injury leave.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;ve never heard this before.  </p>
<p>Intuitively, as the body evolved for walking, I would expect that walking would be healthier than sitting in a chair.  If there&#8217;s non-anecdotal evidence to the contrary, I&#8217;d love to see it.</p>
<p>I do know that in the TSS pods I&#8217;ve seen, inserting sitting anywhere on the line would be a nightmare and would almost certainly increase the odds of injury rather than reduce it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is a batch?</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-15004</link>
		<dc:creator>What is a batch?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-15004</guid>
		<description>[...] Member Forum      « Why handmade is best [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Member Forum      « Why handmade is best [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-15000</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-15000</guid>
		<description>Batching can even be worse in other industries. On this other blog I read, Mark &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leanblog.org/2007/10/this-will-happen-again-unless.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote this&lt;/a&gt;: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;I heard about this story this morning, this horrible tragedy where a 35-year old woman, Darrie Eason (pictured), from New York was told she had cancer and had a double mastectomy done on her, only to find out she really didn&#039;t have cancer. The lab had switched two patient specimens. So the woman who really had cancer didn&#039;t find out right away. The results were read properly by the pathologists, but they were mixed up due to what amounts to an administrative error. The MSNBC article mentioned the practice of &quot;batching&quot; specimens:
&quot;The state report said “the most likely source of the error” was the technician engaging in a practice called “batching,” which involves handling more than one specimen at a time.&quot;

Now, if you&#039;re a manufacturing person, you recognize the term &quot;batching.&quot; It happens all the time in factories. When you implement Lean, you try to reduce your batch sizes to help improve flow. Batching interferes with flow. Batching also harms quality, in a number of ways.

    * The batch is moved and loaded into a &quot;tissue processor.&quot; Now this is inherently a batch process. Think of loading dishes into a dishwasher. Not a perfect analogy, but you don&#039;t load one dish and hit &quot;start.&quot; Not if the dishwasher runs for 12 hours overnight.

Now let&#039;s stop and think about this for a minute. We see the exact same mentality in manufacturing. If you have a factory process that is batch oriented, we tend to use that same mindset and batch everywhere. With Lean in a factory, we move toward flowing up to the batch process and flowing after the batch process -- for quality purposes and other reasons. The same thing can be done in a lab.

    * The tissue then goes through a few more operations. None of which is a batch process. It&#039;s a lot of manual work. But, batching is still the primary mindset. We do a lot of work and let specimens accumulate in a tray until we move them, as a batch, to the next step.

A CBLPath technician who handled Eason&#039;s test admitted to his supervisors that he &quot;occasionally cut corners by batching,&quot; or handling more than one tissue specimen at a time,

Unless the lab had implemented Lean methods, batching was the normal process. It&#039;s not &quot;cutting corners&quot; if you are following the same normal process that everyone else is using. The normal process that sets people up to make errors. To a Lean thinker, the fact that you NEED inspection is a sign that your process is prone to errors. 

The state also claimed: 
&quot;The state health department determined that CBLPath’s error was isolated and found “no systemic problems and no deficiencies” at the lab.&quot; 

Sigh. Let&#039;s just blame the person. Problem solved. Go back to trusting your health system... It’s called “human error” for a reason – we are human and we make mistakes. Smart system design recognizes that and makes it harder for errors to occur.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Batching can even be worse in other industries. On this other blog I read, Mark <a href="http://www.leanblog.org/2007/10/this-will-happen-again-unless.html" rel="nofollow">wrote this</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>I heard about this story this morning, this horrible tragedy where a 35-year old woman, Darrie Eason (pictured), from New York was told she had cancer and had a double mastectomy done on her, only to find out she really didn&#8217;t have cancer. The lab had switched two patient specimens. So the woman who really had cancer didn&#8217;t find out right away. The results were read properly by the pathologists, but they were mixed up due to what amounts to an administrative error. The MSNBC article mentioned the practice of &#8220;batching&#8221; specimens:<br />
&#8220;The state report said “the most likely source of the error” was the technician engaging in a practice called “batching,” which involves handling more than one specimen at a time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;re a manufacturing person, you recognize the term &#8220;batching.&#8221; It happens all the time in factories. When you implement Lean, you try to reduce your batch sizes to help improve flow. Batching interferes with flow. Batching also harms quality, in a number of ways.</p>
<p>    * The batch is moved and loaded into a &#8220;tissue processor.&#8221; Now this is inherently a batch process. Think of loading dishes into a dishwasher. Not a perfect analogy, but you don&#8217;t load one dish and hit &#8220;start.&#8221; Not if the dishwasher runs for 12 hours overnight.</p>
<p>Now let&#8217;s stop and think about this for a minute. We see the exact same mentality in manufacturing. If you have a factory process that is batch oriented, we tend to use that same mindset and batch everywhere. With Lean in a factory, we move toward flowing up to the batch process and flowing after the batch process &#8212; for quality purposes and other reasons. The same thing can be done in a lab.</p>
<p>    * The tissue then goes through a few more operations. None of which is a batch process. It&#8217;s a lot of manual work. But, batching is still the primary mindset. We do a lot of work and let specimens accumulate in a tray until we move them, as a batch, to the next step.</p>
<p>A CBLPath technician who handled Eason&#8217;s test admitted to his supervisors that he &#8220;occasionally cut corners by batching,&#8221; or handling more than one tissue specimen at a time,</p>
<p>Unless the lab had implemented Lean methods, batching was the normal process. It&#8217;s not &#8220;cutting corners&#8221; if you are following the same normal process that everyone else is using. The normal process that sets people up to make errors. To a Lean thinker, the fact that you NEED inspection is a sign that your process is prone to errors. </p>
<p>The state also claimed:<br />
&#8220;The state health department determined that CBLPath’s error was isolated and found “no systemic problems and no deficiencies” at the lab.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sigh. Let&#8217;s just blame the person. Problem solved. Go back to trusting your health system&#8230; It’s called “human error” for a reason – we are human and we make mistakes. Smart system design recognizes that and makes it harder for errors to occur.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb Taylorr</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-14998</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb Taylorr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-14998</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree that correct height is essential, for chairs as well as the tables. I was assuming that each stitcher would be using their own bank of machines and would set their stations to suit their needs. The knee pedal would also have to be set to the right height. 
The shop I worked in with standing machines used wooden platforms to accomodate varying height people (&amp; rubber pads for all standing machines).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree that correct height is essential, for chairs as well as the tables. I was assuming that each stitcher would be using their own bank of machines and would set their stations to suit their needs. The knee pedal would also have to be set to the right height.<br />
The shop I worked in with standing machines used wooden platforms to accomodate varying height people (&amp; rubber pads for all standing machines).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol  Kimball</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-14997</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol  Kimball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-14997</guid>
		<description>Re: alternating sitting and standing

Good idea, but only if your work force falls within a close range of body dimensions. I am quite short, and find a chair ergonomically set for someone 6-8&quot; taller worse than a backless stool.

A set of plastic steps (remember step exercising?) that can easily be kicked along from (tall-standing-height) machine to machine works much better, but only if the machine can be run from a knee press or movable foot control. 

I once worked in a glass studio where the rest were guys 6&#039;4&quot; to 6&#039;6&quot;. They considered the (dangerous) angles I had for the furnaces and glory hole to be my problem. I kicked along a concrete block.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: alternating sitting and standing</p>
<p>Good idea, but only if your work force falls within a close range of body dimensions. I am quite short, and find a chair ergonomically set for someone 6-8&#8243; taller worse than a backless stool.</p>
<p>A set of plastic steps (remember step exercising?) that can easily be kicked along from (tall-standing-height) machine to machine works much better, but only if the machine can be run from a knee press or movable foot control. </p>
<p>I once worked in a glass studio where the rest were guys 6&#8242;4&#8243; to 6&#8242;6&#8243;. They considered the (dangerous) angles I had for the furnaces and glory hole to be my problem. I kicked along a concrete block.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb Taylorr</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/why-handmade-is-best/comment-page-1/#comment-14996</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb Taylorr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=4332#comment-14996</guid>
		<description>In regards to sewng standing up:
I highly reccomend that anyone setting up a lean production factory consider having some machines configured for sitting and some standing. If the stitchers can work from a variety of positins it will be much healthier on their backs, which I expect would boost matabolism and reduce injury leave. I work in this way whenever possible and love the results - better comfort, less fatigue etc. Any chiropracters out there want to comment on this? Back pain is one of this country&#039;s #1 reasons people miss work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regards to sewng standing up:<br />
I highly reccomend that anyone setting up a lean production factory consider having some machines configured for sitting and some standing. If the stitchers can work from a variety of positins it will be much healthier on their backs, which I expect would boost matabolism and reduce injury leave. I work in this way whenever possible and love the results &#8211; better comfort, less fatigue etc. Any chiropracters out there want to comment on this? Back pain is one of this country&#8217;s #1 reasons people miss work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

