Why sewing contractors don’t want small lots

Posted by Kathleen Fasanella on Sep 29, 2011 at 4:29 pm / Contractors, Newbies / Trackback

one_pennyThe universe is speaking to me. This is the redux of questions and conversations I’ve had on this subject over the past several days. No one is to take offense at this posting. I’m laying it out as neutrally as I can.

Here’s the summary first: DEs confuse profit with costs.

You think no one wants your job because the profits are small. I think I can speak for service providers everywhere when I say: in working with a start up, I would be delighted if I broke even on a job. Generating one penny’s profit would be icing on the cake. Unfortunately, profit rarely happens. With small lots from start ups, it is more typical that we don’t recover the costs of what we put into the job. We end up with less after we’re done.

It is very frustrating when DEs complain about what they presume is a contractor’s greed. They think their job is turned down because a contractor won’t get as big of a profit on their small job as they will on a larger one. What a contractor fears is losing more on the small job that he or she can sustain. Profit is not the same thing as cost.

I could go on at length and tell you that service provider’s costs amount to being able to make payroll, pay bills and hopefully draw a modest salary for running the show but I don’t think it really hits home. So here’s an example. I’ve got two of those jobs myself right now. I only took them even knowing I’d lose money because I really want these lines to make it -I’m subsidizing their enterprises. That’s what a service provider is doing when he or she agrees to take on your small lot. They’re taking a risk on you. They want you to make it so they help you out by taking the job. You’re not doing them a favor, they’re doing you one that costs them money so be nice.

My clients have no idea what I’ve lost on their jobs. If anything, they probably think they’re paying through the nose. One job cost me over 25 hours of work but I will probably only bill for 10 of it. Maybe less, I don’t think she has the money. Maybe it sounds crazy to under-bill but there’s a logic to it and no, it’s not because I’m holding out for her to become a major account. Big accounts are risky too (all your eggs are in one basket). The reason is, once I’d committed to the job, to return the work to the customer for reworking their portion of it, would have cost me more than the 25 hours in addition to disrupting my scheduled work calender. Cutting my losses meant putting in the unpaid hours. Depending on how well the customer follows the suggestions I’ve made for future projects will determine whether I’ll do more more work for that customer. That is by the way, why a contractor who did work for you before no longer will. An aside about my two customers, they’ll probably be mortified. They are good, caring, dedicated designers and as responsible as they could be. I like them both and will continue to do work for them schedule permitting.

The other job was about nine hours for which I’ll bill 5. That’s not so bad but this is. In the process of her cutting and sewing a sample, fit testing it and sending the pattern back to me for correction, she did something to her pattern that ruined it. I was sick over it. It is not usable and will take more time to unnecessarily re-cut it in addition to her changes. The additional hours are a complete waste of my time and her money. I’ve decided that I’m going to bill her for some portion of the repair because I’ve written of the problem she created ad nauseum. Unfortunately, I just know that when I tell her, she’s going to say she didn’t know (again, even though I’ve written of it often enough) and she will probably resent having to pay but I’m running her job at a loss already. What do I have to do? Take out a billboard saying “Don’t Do This Because It Really Really Matters Even Though You Think I Mean Everybody Else”?. Sometimes people don’t listen until it costs them. Even if we charge a smaller customer for a portion of the costs they created, the service provider is taking the bigger hit. We can’t possibly fathom the millions of ways a customer can do something to ruin a job and prevent them from doing it -and that’s assuming they’ll listen to us. Many don’t. They think it doesn’t matter or that we’re being picky. Like I said, education costs and a contractor can only afford to underwrite a client’s to a limited extent. When we take a small customer, we pick ones we’re willing to underwrite with the hopes they’ll make a go of it.

So I lost money on these jobs, I’ll survive because I made the decision years ago to not buy anything on credit. But not everyone has that luxury; most contractors are over a barrel in ways I’m not and they can’t absorb losses like I have. They lose less money turning down the job if only because they kept their schedules open to accept other jobs that come in the door. In other words, not only are they not losing over and above their costs, they’re not losing opportunity costs. Which is what I’ve lost. I had to turn down other jobs while doing these. Insult to injury, my customers might think I’m scalping them. Point is, contractors can’t take jobs that result in greater cash going out than coming in if they expect to stay in business because they don’t get external funding from charities. It reminds me of that old joke of losing a penny on every sale but making it up on volume.

DEs think that their small job is better than nothing -but is it? Look at it this way. If a job comes in that will cost me 40 hours of work but I can only get paid for 15 of it, I’ll turn it down because even if I only get another small 15 hour job in the same time frame, that will leave me 25 other hours to develop other projects or business that may pay off down the road. A contractor looks at it the same way especially if their costs are relatively fixed. They’d rather spend 15 hours on a job for which they’ll be fully compensated and have 25 hours “idle” than spend 40 hours on a 15 hour paying job. Namely, those “idle” 25 hours will go into cleaning the place up, doing maintenance, repairing machines or electrical, putting up a website or something like that. They’ll put those 25 hours into their own shop.

I know nobody likes to hear this. Many of you think you’re paying through the nose (and maybe some of you are) but chances are good that if you hired someone good, they’re taking a loss on your small jobs. It’s because there are all kinds of things that are out of the scope of the project and we lose less money by fixing it than we’ll lose by sending it back to you. And I also know that some people think it is our responsibility to educate the customer “if we want the business” but they’re missing the point that we might not want the business. Educating the customer is a retail mindset. You do that so consumers know why they need to buy your stuff. At wholesale, it’s all different. The onus is on you. Contractors want customers who need the least guidance because no matter what, even with the most experienced customer, there are always unexpected or unforeseeable events that increase the cost of the project and remember, the contractor can only charge you based on the quote they gave you. Picking customers with larger orders is a cognitive shortcut. Larger orders are usually indicative of a better educated customer. They’ve been around longer to learn and grow.

If you can prove yourself to be an educated customer to the extent your oversights that create work outside the scope of the project are reduced, there are many contractors would be delighted to work with you on small jobs. The unfortunate thing that happens is one’s oversights create a stop to the whole project, say your zippers didn’t come in. You’re embarrassed and I understand that it’s not your fault but it is not the contractor’s fault either. While not your fault, it is always your responsibility as are the costs -it’s not fair that a contractor incurs losses on something that you are responsible for. Time and time again DEs think this delay is minor but it isn’t. The fabric was spread and cut, the machines threaded over and yet the job can’t start because all your stuff isn’t there. So the cut bundles and whatever else you have is pulled off to the side (let’s hope none of it gets lost) while someone else’s job gets processed. So then maybe you think you’re up next because your zippers have since come in but not quite. They had a schedule and you missed your slot. It may be awhile till they can work you back in. Except it will be worse. It takes longer to re-start a job than it would have taken to do it at the time of scheduling because they won’t remember where they were on it and have to follow the path of the job, redoing some of it. Most contractors don’t charge for that because the time is difficult to account for. So, they’ll just put it off until they have time to do it and since they don’t know how long it will take to re-start it, they may wait for a longer time slot to open up. Which could be months. Meanwhile, your stuff is taking up space, getting mixed up with other people’s stuff, some of it gets lost or whatever.

Few people get rich being a contractor so presumed greed over the profit of your job versus someone else’s has nothing to do with it. The question is better phrased as, on which job will they lose less?

There are three lessons:

  1. Profit is not the same as cost. On small lots, a contractor will risk investing in jobs he or she will lose the least on.
  2. Be responsible for your education. If we could make you learn what we think you need to know, we would.
  3. Have a heart. Realize that with small lots, we’re doing you the favor and not vice versa. We’re losing money on it even though we haven’t told you.

12 Responses to “Why sewing contractors don’t want small lots”

Comments RSS feed

Jennifer
September 29th, 2011
6:03 PM

Kathleen,

thank you for writing this, this is what I’ve been trying to explain to my customers but couldn’t and you did it so eloquently. You are a blessing to all of us…!!

gisela
September 29th, 2011
7:12 PM

Kathleen,

Exactly! I am in the beginning stages of creating my first line, and thankfully I have worked as a Production Manager for Indie Designers and have gone through exactly everything you said! I totally get it that contractors are doing us favors and it urked me when my boss would tell me to treat the contractor otherwise. I even got called out a few times as being to sympathetic towards the contractors and not pushing enough for the line; but I got it. They do lose money as do we, it was one of the hardest tight ropes I had to walk on. I am happy though to have developed relationships with these contractors who have said they are willing to take a risk on me because of my work ethic and I always seemed fair. Hey, that’s where #3 on your list worked to my now having people willing to help me on my first line!

Thanks again for writing a great piece about the ins and outs of the business.

Faviola
September 29th, 2011
9:11 PM

Oh Kathleen!,

You have summed up my life,i am a fashion graduate and i work as a contractor, but i do it ALL myself from patterns to sample and production (yes i’m the one doing the sewing) and sometimes my boyfriend tells me that i work to hard to get so poorly paid by my clients, but i tell him, you never know, i have faith in them. Also i put much pride in the work i do for other people (lots of them aren’t even DE so you can imagine my pride when i see the clothes in the street).

I may not be wealthy, but i think that everyone deserves there chance to make there dreams come true and i’m glad to help them on there way. You never know when there big break is coming and you get that call for something that was worth all the hard work.

Keep writing Kathlenn.

Paula Hudson
September 30th, 2011
8:26 AM

Oh, yes yes yes. From my end, it’s folks who think, “I just need you to replace a zipper. Why should that cost $15.00?” It takes me much longer to do a repair because I have to deconstruct, repair, then reconstruct so that you can’t even tell I took the garment half part! Which is why I charge through the nose for alterations. I *HATE* them. I’ll do them, if you want to pay me a seriously decent price. Otherwise, no hurt feelings here if you go somewhere else. (Not that I’m equating alterations with what you do!! Tangental identification….)

So I absolutely agree with every word you’ve written. Having been on this end, I have a real heart for “your” end and don’t think for a minute that because what you do is “different” from what I do, it is any less valuable. In fact, just the opposite. If I get this stuff right before I start, it saves me a boatload down the road. It flabbergasts me that people don’t grasp that.

Tula
September 30th, 2011
8:36 AM

I think this speaks to a bigger overall problem, namely that DEs may know design and marketing, but are lacking in the matter of the economics of business. It’s not just DEs, but a lot of small business people. People buy into the concept of the business being an “idea” and if they can make this idea into a product, they’ll immediately become successful. You see this a lot on entrepreneurship blogs and articles. They all talk about “following your passion” or “turning your idea into millions” — and there’s nothing wrong with passion or eagerness — yet neglect the nitty gritty mechanics of how to get from point A to point B. There’s a whole lot of work to do before you can even think about turning that idea or design into reality.

Jessica
September 30th, 2011
8:37 AM

So true. I keep hearing over and over that DE’s can’t find contractors who are willing to work with them on small runs, and this post pretty much sums up one of the biggest reasons why. I imagine most larger contractors just aren’t set up to deal with small runs and inexperienced startups; it isn’t worth their time to deal with small time clients and all the inefficiencies that potentially come with such jobs. It seems to me that a contractor would have to be specifically set up to work with indie designers and have a systematic approach to the development and production process that factors in all the education components required along the way to get DE’s up to speed.

I know there are a few contractors out there who are willing to do small runs, but since this type of service typically costs more to cover the extra time and effort that comes along with startup projects, I wonder if this tends to price them out of the market for DE’s with limited budgets? I imagine a production facility has to be extremely flexible in terms of machine set ups and have a versatile staff to efficiently handle lots of small jobs and still make a profit. I can see a potential need for more contractors that are willing to do this and have been contemplating what it would take to set up a DE friendly production facility. However, I wonder how many DE’s would be willing and able to pay the higher rates that would be necessary to fairly compensate the contractor so that they actually have potential to make a profit? Otherwise, what is the motivation for a contractor to be in business to serve DE’s other than altruism? So many people want to be designers these days, but what’s going to attract people to learn the technical skills and work in the production side of the industry making things for all these designers if there’s not much potential profit to be made?

Annie
September 30th, 2011
9:09 AM

Thanks for showing how things are from the contractor’s perspective. This reminds me of the problems that I have when people want me to use my home sewing skills to make them custom clothing. I used to take almost any job, thinking that any money at all was better than nothing. A while ago I realized that I was much better off turning down almost all of the custom orders because they tend to be so complicated and time-consuming. Now I try to stick to sewing what I already sell, and when that isn’t selling I try to use the extra time to educate myself and improve my business. A lot of customers want products that are more trouble than they’re worth, and it’s so difficult to explain that to them. It’s even worse when people take it personally. This helps me understand how DEs can drive people nuts without even realizing what they are doing.

Xochil
September 30th, 2011
10:05 AM

I think contractors are very aware of not trying to rip off a customer, or appearing that they are, which is one of the reasons for minimums. Whether patterns or sewing, spending more time on a project where you are unable to bill for the extra time, such as a client who changes their design in the middle of the pattern process, or loses a pattern piece between fittings, or the contractor needs to stop a project because the zippers aren’t in, the buttons aren’t in, etc. Each time the client has to be called in to remedy the situation, the contractor loses that time, plus potential opportunity, which no one really thinks about. Thanks Kathleen for being so open on this topic.

Kate Rawlinson
September 30th, 2011
10:44 AM

This is all very interesting, but what I don’t understand with the two examples of DEs you gave, is why you don’t charge them for the extra hours? I get the logic that it would take longer for you to return it to them and have them redo their part, but why not bill them for the extra work they’ve caused you? In the case of the DE who ruined the pattern, in an area you’ve written about extensively before, why not just say, look, you did this, here’s where I’ve pointed out this error a million times, and that’s why it’s taken me extra hours to correct.

Maybe I’m being really dim here, but it seems like the worst-case scenario is that they wouldn’t use you in future, but that doesn’t seem to be a great loss. I’m not being snippy here, I just genuinely don’t understand why you wouldn’t bill the clients for extra work if the fault lies with them. (I’ve worked extra hours for nothing in the past because I’ve taken on work and promised to do it within a certain timeframe, but in that scenario the fault – ie that I couldn’t get it done in the time I’d originally estimated – was mine. If they subsequently sent me a load more stuff to do within the same timeframe, I would charge more – which seems like the same equation to me, you’re being asked to do more work beyond what was initially agreed.)

Cheryl
September 30th, 2011
11:14 AM

Hi Kathleen,
I love your site and your book. I make a living as a seamstress. Most of my jobs are alterations but I do custom work when people are willing to pay for it. You do not need to apologize for earning your living. You are a business, not a non-profit. I receive phone calls from potential customers. We chat about their project and I add about 40% to what I ‘think’ the labor cost will be. I have under-estimated enough times, I refuse to cheat myself again. The phone call often ends in silence from their end. They think a ‘custom’ job will cost the same as a department/bridal store item…..Umm..no… I refuse to donate my talent. I do charitable work for the local animal shelter. I am a business that needs to make a profit. If you feel strongly about helping small/new designers maybe you should choose how many hours you are willing to donate at the beginning of each year? That’s what I do for charity work. Pick a figure and that’s it…. If they want your ‘training’, they need to pay you for your time. If they cannot afford your time, that is not your problem. A business must make money or close their doors. It really is as simple as that.

Dara
April 3rd, 2012
8:47 PM

Thank you, wonderful post!

jacqueline m
May 17th, 2014
6:31 AM

thank you for wonderful posts
please let me know if you have any contractors for evening wear in the NY area

Leave a Reply

Archives

Categories

The Entrepreneur's Guide to Sewn Product Manufacturing

Often described as the garment industry “blue book”, the most highly rated book in the business is guaranteed to get you off to a solid start or your money back. Many service providers require you read this before they’ll work with you. Learn more »

Subscription Options

RSS Feed Google Reader My Yahoo My MSN Technorati

Subscribe by email: