<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fashion Incubator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com</link>
	<description>How to start a clothing line or run the one you have, better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:16:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Pop Quiz: How to shorten a dart? pt.2</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pop-quiz-how-to-shorten-a-dart-pt-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pop-quiz-how-to-shorten-a-dart-pt-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Quiz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought this would be an open and shut case, silly me. It wasn't a trick question but we did get off track a bit (that's not a complaint). The proposition was simple -how to shorten a dart- but we stepped off into whether it should be shortened, other associated fit problems etc., all topics worthy of exploring. I propose we analyze comments in two parts -as best as we are able. First up, how to shorten a dart. Second part, alternative proposals and all the other fun what-ifs we love to debate. Game?

<strong>Part one:</strong> original context of how to shorten a dart.
If we were giving out prizes -in this admittedly narrow context- those would go to CLF, Lauren, D Scheidt, dosfashionistas, Anne, Lisa, Donna, Paula (who said she agreed with Mimi but whose illustration was like the above) and Yvonne. Bonus points to everybody who mentioned you needed to prove the altered dart by truing it to the waistline seam. Don't do that and I'll skin you alive. That doesn't mean everybody else is wrong but I'll get to that.

The only difference between what everyone else said and the way I do it is that I prefer to work from nett. Before shortening the dart, I'd draw in the finished sewn dimensions of the dart (which finishes 1/2" beyond the punch end), from there draw a vertical line midway between the two legs, shorten it the proscribed amount and then come back another half inch for the punch hole dart end. Is my way better? Doubtful. It's life long habit.

<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/dart_shortening_compared1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6331" title="dart_shortening_compared1" src="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/dart_shortening_compared1.jpg" alt="dart_shortening_compared1" width="447" height="329" /></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pop-quiz-how-to-shorten-a-dart-pt-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Quiz: How to shorten a dart?</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pop-quiz-how-to-shorten-a-dart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pop-quiz-how-to-shorten-a-dart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Patterns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Quiz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/shorten_dart_popquiz_pt1sm.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-6313" title="shorten_dart_popquiz_pt1sm" src="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/shorten_dart_popquiz_pt1sm.jpg" alt="shorten_dart_popquiz_pt1sm" width="201" height="299" /></a>I didn't know that how to shorten a dart was a subject of confusion but apparently it is. Two competing methods were published in two different editions of the same pattern making book (the book won't be named) and the crazy thing is, the version I thought was correct was deleted and replaced with what I felt was an incorrect method in the newest edition. Maybe I was brainwashed with the earlier method? Regardless, I'm interested in what you have to say. Not that I think it's appropriate that we decide which method is correct based on a show of hands so arguments supporting your case will be important.

Using the example of the sketch at right -<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/shorten_dart_popquiz_pt1.jpg" target="_blank">this larger version</a> will open in a new window for printing- please illustrate how you'd shorten this dart. Alternatively, you could explain it or even, ask related questions. If you prefer, you can also use a sketch of your own making. You can post a link to your version in comments or you can <a href="mailto:kathleen@fashion-incubator.com">email it</a> to me. Thanks everybody!]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pop-quiz-how-to-shorten-a-dart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archives 3/5- 3/11 2005-2009</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/archives-35-311-2005-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/archives-35-311-2005-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 23:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is an event of interest on the west coast next week. On Monday the 15th, the Los Angeles International Textile Show starts and runs through Wednesday the 17th. There's about 200 vendors, focus of the show are fabrics and various sundries suitable for Spring &#38; Summer 2011. <a href="http://www.californiamarketcenter.com/latextile/latextile_exhibitors.php" target="_blank">More info</a>.

The week following on the 25th from 2-7 PM, Style Careers is having a job fair at the Copper Design Space. <a href="http://www.stylecareers.com/internalad.asp" target="_blank">Pre-registration is recommended</a> because everyone is screened before they let you in the door. You need a two or four year design degree or commensurate experience. SC mentions that store-level retail and internships don't qualify as experience. A $10 fee is required to get in, cash only. Break a leg.

And now, here's this week's <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/the_archives.html">archives</a> entry. May your weekend be fun and relaxing. 

<strong>March 5, through March 11, 2005</strong>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/tv_blogs_girlie_girls_call_of_the_mall/" target="_blank">TV, blogs, girlie-girls &#38; call of the mall</a>

<strong>March 5, through March 11, 2006</strong>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/reverse_engineering_standard_work_pt7/" target="_blank">Reverse engineering standard work pt.7</a>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/they_cant_make_what_i_designed/" target="_blank">They can't make what I designed</a>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/is_the_customer_always_right/" target="_blank">Is the customer always right?</a>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/how_to_order_labels_pt1/" target="_blank">How to order labels pt.1</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/archives-35-311-2005-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hiring a full package sewing contractor pt.1</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/hiring-a-full-package-sewing-contractor-pt-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/hiring-a-full-package-sewing-contractor-pt-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contractors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's been a dramatic increase in the number of people who would like to hire a full package sewing contractor to provide a broader gamut of services than is traditional. There are good reasons for wanting full package but it will be helpful to know why it may not be for everyone. If it is to your benefit, guidelines can help you define your needs and search more effectively. If not, you'll spend less time questing for the Holy Grail, figuring out other ways to get it done. Before I get into what the guidelines may be (pt.2), we should mention definitions which can conflict with expectations. 

The definition of what full package service means has evolved. Depending on where you operate your business, full package can mean different things. In NY, the traditional definition of full package referred to a contractor who could cut, sew and trim from the same space. Owing to the cost of real estate, this sort of operation wasn't very common. It was common to make patterns and samples in one place, cut in another and sew in still another. One needed to schlep stuff from one contractor to another but it generally worked out okay since these businesses were relatively close to each other, the occasional exception being cutting due to the increased need of square footage. 

Industry culture also played a role in how contractors were set up as enterprises moved from the first tier city (there used to be just one -NY) to the hinterlands of Dallas, Atlanta or Los Angeles. In spite of having lower real estate costs with the possibility of including cutting, some businesses didn't do that because they didn't know how, weren't interested or they didn't need to because they were dealing with other NY refugees who were accustomed to doing business the old way. The innovation in the south and west arose slowly from those who realized they could put everything together under one roof. As this model became more common, it evolved to become a pervasive expectation what we now call CM&#038;T. However, we are faced with continuing evolution of the definition of full package. Among today's designers, the definition of a full package contractor is fluid. Full package is ambiguous and usually self-defined based on one's particular needs. At close, it will be helpful if you can define what full package means to you.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/hiring-a-full-package-sewing-contractor-pt-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IP Update: DPPA &amp; Fashion Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/ip-update-dppa-fashion-law-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/ip-update-dppa-fashion-law-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three strikes, you're out! Yes? No? 
Apparently not. 

The Boston Globe <a target="_blank" href="http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/fashion/articles/2010/03/07/should_the_law_protect_fashion_from_knockoffs/">reports</a> that NY Senator Charles Schumer is preparing to reintroduce the <a target="_blank" href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2196/show">Design Piracy Prohibition Act</a> for the fourth time. His latest effort has been buoyed by <a target="_blank" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeannie_Suk">Jeannie Suk</a>, feminist cum fashionista at Harvard Law School who recently authored a paper entitled <a target="_blank" href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1323487">Law, Culture and the Economics of Fashion</a>. From the Boston Globe:

<i>Suk says she found it strange that there were laws in place protecting artists and writers, but not fashion designers. She was also concerned that this anomaly could deter people from going into fashion design.
</i>

Other than that there are existing laws and regulations to protect designers that aren't being enforced, I'll grant she knows more about law than I do but then I know more about apparel than she does. If the DPPA passes, our problem won't be limited to deterring people from coming into the industry, it'll be keeping the ones we already have alive. Under DPPA, every DE will have to spend incalculable thousands of dollars on legal fees to prove originality of their concepts or they're not going to find a contractor who will sew it up for them. They won't be able to find retail buyers either. Without indemnity, who wants to get sued and go to prison? ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/ip-update-dppa-fashion-law-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pattern puzzle: Tasha Stogaya</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pattern-puzzle-tasha-stogaya/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pattern-puzzle-tasha-stogaya/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pattern Puzzle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/tasha_strogaya_sm.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-6268" title="tasha_strogaya_sm" src="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/tasha_strogaya_sm.jpg" alt="tasha_strogaya_sm" width="409" height="417" /></a>I don't remember how I discovered Russian designer <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;hs=Oq3&#38;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#38;ei=k0-VS5bTLpCiswPy95D9Aw&#38;sa=X&#38;oi=spell&#38;resnum=0&#38;ct=result&#38;cd=1&#38;ved=0CAUQBSgA&#38;q=Tasha+Strogaya" target="_blank">Tasha Strogaya</a> but she does some interesting pieces. I'm intrigued by Russian designers, particularly their use of style lines. Illustrated at right is an example of Tasha's work featuring the style line seams (<a href="http://www.boutique-online.ru/thing/4316/" target="_blank">buy it here</a>). A slightly larger version of this illustration is <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/tasha_strogaya_lg.jpg" target="_blank">here</a>.

I'm not wild on the fit of this style. Oh that's not right. What I mean to say is that these style lines are placed in such a way that darts are not necessary to draw it in for a closer fitting silhouette -which is what I think this style should be -but then I'm not the designer. Maybe I'm drawn to it because these are the sort of style lines I like; namely, those that eliminate the need of darts in their entirety. It's no trick to take a flat shapeless garment sans fitting darts and break it up into sections to sew back together. All said and done, this style is likely designed for a different figure type than this mannequin represents. I still think it's a nice piece.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/pattern-puzzle-tasha-stogaya/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Archives 2/26- 3/4 2005-2009</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/archives-226-34-2005-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/archives-226-34-2005-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Admin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/daffodil.JPG"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-6262" title="daffodil" src="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/daffodil.JPG" alt="daffodil" width="400" height="348" /></a>Airing out the winter bedding today, I found the first volunteer in the flower bed. It's a tiny one, the photo doesn't provide scale. Rumor has it these are coming up in many parts of the country. Daffodils are a cheery, optimistic flower that tells us of spring to come. Much nicer than a ground hog. Not that I've seen a ground hog in anything less than a... disordered state. <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/shop_cat/" target="_blank">Shop cat</a> used to summarily dispatch those.

As ever, here's the selection from the <a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/the_archives.html" target="_blank">archives</a> for this week in blog history -which includes the tail end of the MAGIC trade show reports. Have a productive and relaxing week end.

<strong>February 26, through March 4, 2005</strong>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/the_zen_of_the_survival_of_the_prettiest/" target="_blank">The zen of the survival of the prettiest</a>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/tailoring_and_the_english_cut/" target="_blank">Tailoring and The English Cut</a>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/oh_joy/" target="_blank">Oh joy</a>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/product_review_style_12658/" target="_blank">Product Review Style# 12658</a>
<a href="http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/intolerable_ugliness_or_the_shape_of_things_to_come/" target="_blank">Intolerable ugliness or the shape of things to come?</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/archives-226-34-2005-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>21 mistakes fashion designers can make</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/21-mistakes-fashion-designers-can-make/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/21-mistakes-fashion-designers-can-make/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newbies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Follows is a guest entry from <a href="http://www.pattern-design.com" target="_blank">Sally Beers</a>, a pattern maker with over 30 years experience. Born and raised in New York, she worked in the fast paced city for 25 years before moving to New Mexico five years ago. Available to assist you with your projects, her contact information appears at close.
<h2>21 mistakes fashion designers can make</h2>
<strong>Product Development</strong>
1. Not narrowing your focus. It’s best to specialize. Decide on one type of garment to sell and limit the number of styles, colors and sizes whenever possible. I know that was my biggest mistake. Forego that vision of competing with Jean Paul Gaultier or Zara.

2. Not understanding the time it takes to develop a new product. If you are planning to launch in Feb 2011 give yourself 2 yrs. If it happens before then, great, but when manufacturing is involved, you need to build relationships with your suppliers and contractors. You will need many moons to prove yourself to them and them to you.

3. Trying to take on difficult markets like labor intensive lingerie. Bras and shape wear can be very hard to produce. With very few factories in this country a designer is looking at large quantities and faraway factories.

4. Not looking closely at the current market.

5. Not establishing good fit from the very beginning.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/21-mistakes-fashion-designers-can-make/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a gusset?</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/what-is-a-gusset/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/what-is-a-gusset/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two anonymous parties with opposing views on the definition of gussets are collaborating on a project that I will publish as soon as it's ready. While not yet published publicly, the opinions of each are already stated (in the forum) so I thought it might be fun to read how you would define a gusset while we're waiting. Even though your comments aren't likely to change the opinions of said parties, input would be very useful in guiding the project authors to cover contingencies, eliminate ambiguities and answer any questions.

Are you game? Okay, so what is a gusset?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/what-is-a-gusset/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Reshoring -circuitously</title>
		<link>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/what-is-reshoring-circuitously/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/what-is-reshoring-circuitously/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen Fasanella</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Glossary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lean Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fashion-incubator.com/?p=6237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via <a target="_blank" href="http://www.evolvingexcellence.com/blog/2010/03/returning-to-america-more-stories.html">Evolving Excellence</a>, I found a new-to-me site called <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pddnet.com/">Product Design &#38; Development</a> which I thought was pretty interesting. EE mentioned a recent post there, <a href="http://www.pddnet.com/column-mike-collins-re-shoring-bringing-manufacturing-back-to-american-suppliers-021610/" target="_blank">Re-Shoring – Bringing Manufacturing Back To American Suppliers</a> which I liked. While I try to remain vigilant and wary of the echo chamber, the entry was a good briefing on a variety of larger enterprises which have repatriated their production to the U.S.. I can't predict how the material will play to this (or any) audience. Either you agree outsourcing is undesirable and high-five your like minded kindred or you've decided the payoff is worth the risks. I imply no judgments either way. 

Other entries on the site were interesting (I did say this was circuitous) such as the one about <a target="_blank" href="http://www.pddnet.com/column-david-mantey-apple-cares-about-your-employees-030210/">Apple's efforts to police their overseas contractors</a>. Again, one could high-five Apple, great guys they are or you can take it the other way, that great guys would have been more vigilant to prevent employee suicide. There's a link in the post to <a target="_blank" href="http://images.apple.com/supplierresponsibility/pdf/SR_2010_Progress_Report.pdf">Apple's supplier responsibility progress report for 2010</a> (pdf), a white paper prettied up that explains their overseas manufacturing auditing process. This document is very good; it's clean, readable and provides a lot of plain language guidance anyone could use to set inspection standards for any contractor they use, be they foreign or domestic. I hope you read it. That the paper was disseminated widely to the public is shrewd strategy if the transparency bolsters Apple's credibility with consumers. And I think it will, admittedly perhaps self-servingly because I know I don't want to feel guilty over having purchased my iPhone. The point is, look over the guide, the audit description starts on page 13 and consider using some of those guidelines yourself. Likewise, make the results of your process transparent to consumers via download on your websites.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fashion-incubator.com/archive/what-is-reshoring-circuitously/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.195 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-03-18 07:37:17 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->